1962 Ferrari 156 vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1962 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1037 kg more than 1962 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ferrari 156 | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 156 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1497 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 61 L |
