1962 Ferrari 156 vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 2,442 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2006 Volvo V50. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo V50 weights approximately 965 kg more than 1962 Ferrari 156.
Because 1962 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ferrari 156 | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Ferrari | Volvo |
| Model | 156 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 60 L |
