1962 Ferrari 156 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1962 Ferrari 156.
Because 1962 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ferrari 156 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ferrari | Mazda |
Model | 156 | 6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 70 L |