1962 Ferrari 156 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1962 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1296 kg more than 1962 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ferrari 156 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ferrari | Cadillac |
| Model | 156 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 68 L |
