1962 Fiat 1100 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1962 Fiat 1100. (43 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Fiat 1100 weights approximately 430 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Fiat 1100 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Fiat | Westfield |
| Model | 1100 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2320 mm |
