1962 Fiat 1300 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat 1300 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1962 Fiat 1300. (64 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Fiat 1300 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Fiat 1300. (93 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Fiat 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Fiat 1300 | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 65 L |