1962 Fiat 1300 vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Fiat 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Panda (70 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1962 Fiat 1300. (64 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat 1300.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Fiat 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Panda (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Fiat 1300. (93 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Fiat 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Fiat 1300 | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Fiat | Fiat |
| Model | 1300 | Panda |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1251 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 69.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
