1962 Fiat 1300 vs. 2006 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2006 Ford Bantam is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat 1300 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Bantam (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 Fiat 1300. (64 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Bantam weights approximately 1896 kg more than 1962 Fiat 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Fiat 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Fiat 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Bantam (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Fiat 1300. (93 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Fiat 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Fiat 1300 | 2006 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Bantam |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 54 L |