1962 Fiat 1300 vs. 2010 BMW 320
To start off, 2010 BMW 320 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat 1300 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 320 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1962 Fiat 1300. (64 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Fiat 1300. (93 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Fiat 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Fiat 1300 | 2010 BMW 320 | |
Make | Fiat | BMW |
Model | 1300 | 320 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 57 L |