1962 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. (62 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 605 kg more than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (196 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. (94 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Fiat Cabriolet | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Cabriolet | Condor |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1495 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |