1962 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. (62 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1532 kg more than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Fiat Cabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Fiat Cabriolet | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Cabriolet | E-350 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 132 L |