1962 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1962 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 315 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 1962 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Fiat Campagnola | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Mustang |
Year Released | 1962 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |