1962 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1962 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1962 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 647 kg more than 1962 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Fiat Grand Break | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercury |
| Model | Grand Break | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1917 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 85 L |
