1962 Ford Anglia vs. 2001 Pininfarina Start
To start off, 2001 Pininfarina Start is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Pininfarina Start is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Pininfarina Start, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Pininfarina Start has automatic transmission and 1962 Ford Anglia has manual transmission. 1962 Ford Anglia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Pininfarina Start will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Anglia | 2001 Pininfarina Start | |
| Make | Ford | Pininfarina |
| Model | Anglia | Start |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2520 mm |
