1962 Ford Anglia vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Ford Anglia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Anglia weights approximately 28 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Anglia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Anglia | 2005 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Anglia | Minica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 738 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2350 mm |
