1962 Ford Anglia vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Montana is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (200 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1962 Ford Anglia. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Anglia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 1247 kg more than 1962 Ford Anglia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Anglia. (70 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Anglia. 2005 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 1962 Ford Anglia has manual transmission. 1962 Ford Anglia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Anglia | 2005 Pontiac Montana | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Anglia | Montana |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 738 kg | 1985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 95 L |