1962 Ford Capri vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 217 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Ford Capri (185 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 1962 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Capri | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Capri | 2000 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 91 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 953 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |