1962 Ford Capri vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Capri weights approximately 103 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Ford Capri (185 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 1962 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Capri | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Capri | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1974 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 953 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |
