1962 Ford Capri vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (120 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 197 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Ford Capri (185 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (162 Nm). This means 1962 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Capri | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Capri | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 953 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |
