1962 Ford Capri vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1983 Volvo 240 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 240 (112 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 347 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 185 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Capri | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Capri | 240 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2316 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 112 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 953 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2660 mm |
