1962 Ford Capri vs. 1998 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (280 HP) has 221 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 317 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (315 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Capri. (185 Nm). This means 1998 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Capri.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Capri | 1998 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Capri | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 315 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 953 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 76 L |