1962 Ford Capri vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (122 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 472 kg more than 1962 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Ford Capri (185 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (167 Nm). This means 1962 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Capri | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Capri | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 953 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 57 L |
