1962 Ford Capri vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C30 (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1962 Ford Capri. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Capri.
Because 1962 Ford Capri is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Capri. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C30 (240 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Capri. (185 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Capri.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Capri | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Capri | C30 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |