1962 Ford Cortina vs. 2003 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2003 Seat Toledo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Seat Toledo (104 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1962 Ford Cortina. (48 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Toledo weights approximately 442 kg more than 1962 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Seat Toledo (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Cortina | 2003 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Cortina | Toledo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 778 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 55 L |