1962 Ford Cortina vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1962 Ford Cortina. (48 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Cortina.
Because 1962 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Cortina. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1962 Ford Cortina has manual transmission. 1962 Ford Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Cortina | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cortina | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |