1962 Ford Cortina vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,455 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1962 Ford Cortina. (48 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Cortina.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Outback (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Cortina | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Cortina | Outback |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2455 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
