1962 Ford Popular vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Popular would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (98 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1962 Ford Popular. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 465 kg more than 1962 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Popular | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Popular | Sigma |
Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2520 mm |