1962 Ford Popular vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Popular would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1962 Ford Popular. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 900 kg more than 1962 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Popular | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Popular | Omega |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.9 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2740 mm |