1962 Ford Taunus vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2480 mm |