1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2000 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Taunus | 2000 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Mahindra |
| Model | Taunus | Armada |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4310 mm |
