1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2003 Jaguar R-D6
To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (230 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar R-D6 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 2003 Jaguar R-D6 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Taunus | R-D6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2720 mm |