1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2003 Noble M14
To start off, 2003 Noble M14 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Noble M14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Noble M14 (396 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Noble M14 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Noble M14 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 2003 Noble M14 | |
Make | Ford | Noble |
Model | Taunus | M14 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 396 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2440 mm |