1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2003 Renault Megane

To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Megane weights approximately 370 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Ford Taunus 2003 Renault Megane
Make Ford Renault
Model Taunus Megane
Year Released 1962 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1183 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 38 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4200 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 845 kg 1215 kg
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2810 mm