1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (170 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Taunus | S40 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2650 mm |