1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1591 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Taunus | Mark LT |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 2436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3520 mm |