1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 949 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Taunus | CTS |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 307 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2890 mm |