1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,353 cc, 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 616 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Taunus | CR-V |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2353 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2630 mm |