1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1310 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Taunus | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Taunus | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2860 mm |
