1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2011 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Tundra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 343 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 487 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Taunus | 2011 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Taunus | Tundra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3710 mm |