1962 Ford Taunus vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 458 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Ford Taunus 2013 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Taunus 3
Year Released 1962 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1183 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 38 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 845 kg 1303 kg
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2640 mm