1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1982 Jaguar XJR is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 975 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Thunderbird | XJR |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 90 L |