1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1986 Saab 9000
To start off, 1986 Saab 9000 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1986 Saab 9000. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1986 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 591 kg more than 1986 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 1986 Saab 9000 | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Thunderbird | 9000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |
