1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1994 Opel Omega
To start off, 1994 Opel Omega is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1994 Opel Omega. (207 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1994 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 395 kg more than 1994 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 1994 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Thunderbird | Omega |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 2962 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 75 L |
