1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 615 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | AA-X |
Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1260 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2530 mm |