1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro
To start off, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro (741 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 219 kg more than 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro | |
| Make | Ford | Lotec |
| Model | Thunderbird | Testa de Oro |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 4943 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 741 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1656 kg |
