1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 295 kg more than 1998 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Thunderbird | CL |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |