1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1165 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Minica |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2350 mm |