1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 577 kg more than 2001 Ford 49. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2001 Ford 49 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Thunderbird | 49 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 3899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |
