1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2001 Ford Laser
To start off, 2001 Ford Laser is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2001 Ford Laser. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 760 kg more than 2001 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2001 Ford Laser | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | Laser |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |