1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (205 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Thunderbird | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 3163 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 205 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1874 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 74 L |
